Last April, former President Barack Obama released a video warning us not to believe everything we see and hear on the internet, at least many thought it was from the ex-president. In actuality, it was produced by actor and director Jordan Peele using artificial intelligence (AI) and highlighted
What do we want AI to be? Should it be like the computer from Star Trek or Her or will it be more like HAL 9000 from 2001: A Space Odyssey, Ultron from Avengers, or any of the bad Terminators? Perhaps more science-fiction than anything reality could produce, as AI continues to be more embedded in our lives, its application is constantly being debated, by technologists like Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and former Google (Alphabet) chairman Eric Schmidt, many worried about jobs being replaced due to automation or the potential evils that could arise.
Amid all the fears of AI, be it around misinformation, inequality
“Embrace” computational design
In its fifth year, the Design in Tech Report offers Maeda’s perspective on the profession’s impact on the tech sector. In 2016. he introduced three types
As Maeda told me back then, classical thinking is the education that designers currently receive in school, which is used in media like print and physical displays. “It’s art,” he explained, saying that it will be around for centuries and will affect designers’ ability to be creative.
With design thinking, it supports having multi-disciplined designers, those that are not only artistic but can program and/or understand business. These hybrid designers, as I wrote back in 2017, are “able to recognize the complexities that exist within tech products, as well as the design challenges that lie within them. Whether it’s designing solutions for voice-powered services, hardware, mobile apps, or making something more accessible to a variety of people, staying in one’s lane is no longer an option, at least not in tech.”
This year’s report targets computational design and Maeda believes that the professional has reached a level of “maturity” that it can offset fears about AI’s future. But what is computational design? In my coverage of the 2016 Design in Tech Report, it involves designers who “have an understanding of algorithms and processes, especially those who can think about the customer experience in mobile apps, Internet-connected devices, autonomous vehicles, virtual reality, and other spaces.”
To Maeda, computational designers not only understand the world of engineers, but have the artistic and inclusive mindset needed to ensure that AI can remain unbiased, inclusive, and ethical in order to benefit all humanity, reducing the number of incidents like the one where Google Photos’ algorithm mistakenly identified African Americans as gorillas or how Microsoft’s Tay chatbot became a racist thanks to learnings from the internet.
AI’s adoption is growing quickly even if you didn’t realize it. Have you used an application like Grammarly, Google Photos, Prisma, or do you have an iPhone, Android device, or shop on Amazon? Maybe you have an Amazon Echo device, Google Home, or a Nest smart thermostat? All of these things are infused with AI and is constantly learning, so Maeda suggests companies include design in the development process in order to ensure that their technologies are as open and welcoming to all as possible.
Integrating design into the computational world is an asset, Maeda asserts. Using the “Four Planets” concept, he states that designers are able to be on Planet Listen where they’re able to receive feedback and know their customers, unlike developers which may reside on Planet Deliver where it’s about building and production. Maeda doesn’t claim that this is true for all developers but that designers are the ones who tend to have more interactions with the end user — something emphasized in last year’s Design in Tech Report.
Ultimately Maeda embraces technology’s future, encouraging us to follow through on innovation. He urges us to “be curious” and to embrace computational algorithms.
Everyone wins when the focus is on the customer
In each of his reports, Maeda offers a snapshot of design’s state in tech including how many legacy companies have acquired design firms — in the last 12 months, at least 19 businesses were purchased according to Maeda. Within Silicon Valley, there is a “design-led” movement along with other takes such as “product-led” and “sales-led”. But Maeda’s report doesn’t take the position of putting design above all others. In reality, it’s about teamwork and that everything will succeed when design plays a supporting role.
When asked to elaborate on this stance, Maeda told me in an email: “Teamwork has long been more important than anything else to me. ‘Engineering-led,’ or ‘Product-led,’ or ‘Marketing-led,’ or ‘Design-led’ all imply to some degree the importance of a discipline’s performance over and above the performance of the entire team. I believe that when we place a focus on the customers’ needs and when we work as a team to satisfy their hopes and dreams, then everyone wins together.”
In other words, no one discipline can be correct, but applied together like Voltron, and businesses can succeed. Although as an advocate for design, it does seem that Maeda wants to reinforce the benefits design has on any company, just not that it should take a seat on the Iron Throne.
You can watch Maeda’s SXSW presentation of his 2019 Design in Tech Report below. It’s also available in full on his website or you can read it on Flipboard along with additional supporting materials that Maeda used.
You must be logged in to post a comment.